I think both MCA and EISA had made a mistake by requiring the configuration be stored on disk.
This is why I don't love PS/2 machines. I'm a huge fan of PS/1 and early Aptivas, which shared some of the design traits with the PS/2 lineup, though. I love almost every PS/2 case design I've seen (except opening the 25/30.. that's a pain in the ass), especially the towers. However, MCA and EISA are a pain in the ass - especially in this era where the configuration disks are lost with time - granted, with PS/2s that isn't as much of an issue, because they were available on the FTP for so long. However, it just seems silly and clunky to have any dependence on a particular disk for a machine to boot properly..
As well, the licensing costs on MCA meant choices were very limited. If every PS/2 came with MCA *and* ISA/EISA, it would have been a lot better, because you could drag a few cards over to the MCA platform. They could do it like they did with PCI, making a bridge chip that did MCA to ISA.. Businesses which invested in expensive and/or proprietary cards weren't going to switch to them, the prices were higher (alienating home users for the most part), and you lost compatibility with the rest of the market..
The only PS/2 class machines I like are the 25, 30, and Eduquest models - particularly the Eduquest.. mostly for the reason of non-MCA architecture.
I had a 55SX and a 70 at one point, and after realizing I didn't have a non-token-ring network card for them, no choice of video card, no sound cards at all, and so on, as well as not being able to make them boot (with the reference disks), I gave up on the whole lineup.