Congratulations! I randomly chose the file that I had in hopes that earliest = better. Apparently, it was too early for your card. Good to see that you found the right version.
Since this tidbit of knowledge seems to be sinking below general awareness, it's worth going over again.
To start with, SCSI packets and messages as sent to a device have been ANSI standards for a long time. So you don't need to know whose tape or disk drive you're attaching to; just that it's a disk or tape with certain capabilities.
That's great, but initially, every SCSI controller required its own drivers for every device type. This could be a real problem if the vendor didn't develop a driver, for example, for your particular roboticzied cigar lighter. So someone came up with a great idea--to introduce an intermediate driver to abstract the controller details into a standard interface, so that everyone needed only a single driver for each device type. Thus, I needed only one driver for my cigar lighter, regardless of whose controller I was using, so long as the controller vendor gave me that intermediate driver. A wonderful idea.
Adaptec came out with their version of the intermediate driver and called it ASPI (Adaptec SCSI Programming Interface). As time went on, other controller vendors came up with their own versions, so the "A" was changed from "Adaptec" to "Advanced", so that nobody got their feathers ruffled. It's so simple that often, a program can skip the need for a device-specific driver and simply use ASPI commands directly. ASPI exists in both 16 and 32-bit versions, but wasn't officially supported by the Windows NT family until quite late; Microsoft was promoting their own SPTI "SCSI pass-through interface"), apparently not wanting to be indebted to Adaptec.
Around the same time, DEC and Future Domain were promoting an alternative called CAM ("Common Access Method"), which really is a superset of ASPI and bears the imprimatur of an ANSI (X3T10) standard. Future Domain initially supplied only CAM for a lot of their controllers, but one could use yet another layer (ASPICAM.SYS) to convert ASPI calls to CAM (doing the reverse is more difficult as CAM covers a lot more ground).
So if you get a SCSI controller, it's prudent to find out if the thing has an ASPI or CAM driver also. With either of those, you're good to go with just about any device.
Tidbit: IDE/ATA tried to get a similar system going and called it "ATASPI". It survives in a few products, but pretty much has fallen by the wayside. Too bad--ASPI/CAM is a great concept.