• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here

Recent content by Rhinozz

  1. R

    Seattle Computer Products 86-DOS

    Sorry for the late reply, but yes, I've seen it. I did not write any of it - I believe that honor would go to Matthias Paul. While it has a lot of good information, it's not too in-depth. Attached to this message is my timeline of 86-DOS so far. It's "complete" (I'm still on the hunt for more...
  2. R

    Seattle Computer Products 86-DOS

    I do know that the LDP88 and also Seattle Computer Products' 8086 System weren't complete computers. I'm unable to verify that the LDP1 and LDP2 weren't complete. By "the Ray Duncan book" from 1986, do you mean the MS-DOS Technical Reference Encyclopedia? I have a scan of the first few pages -...
  3. R

    Seattle Computer Products 86-DOS

    Mostly, yes. (Some of the below information is new, AFAIK, so ask me if you want any sources.) Tim Paterson was Seattle Computer Products' first full-time employee. He got approval to write 86-DOS in early February 1980 after CP/M-86 was delayed. He was able to start writing the kernel and main...
  4. R

    Seattle Computer Products 86-DOS

    Hey VCF, I'm on the search for any copies of 86-DOS anyone may have. I have every copy I know of already on the internet, but they only cover 9 copies (including the 4 I got via email) and 3 versions, all 3 of which are in the 1.xx area. All copies sold before May 1981 are of extreme interest...
Back
Top