This is the reason that with the cassette out, its better to cover the central lamp or LED with a piece of black tube, and test it in relatively low ambient lighting, otherwise you have to cover both sensors.
I repaired VCR's for a living back in the early 1980's in Auckland NZ. And I ran training courses to help TV technicians understand VCRs. Both VHS machines and Umatic machines used in production houses and Universities. I know many models like the back of my hand.
At that time, most TV repair companies knew little about them, especially the Head Drum and Capstan servo systems. The manufacturers were also transitioning from machines with mechanical buttons and 4000 series cmos logic control boards, to those with touch buttons and CPU control. JVC around this time produced a compact portable machine, the HR2200 (I had most of the schematic of that one in my head). It had a mechanical fault in the tape transport. When the tape unlaced, it had a slack loop and got caught in the cassette door flap on ejecting, damaging the tape. Rather than issuing a mechanical fix, they did a firmware update that shuttled a reel motor to tighten the loop at the beginning of the eject sequence. When I saw that solution I thought... Oh God No.
It really was the thin end of a nasty wedge, where over the years after that, many machines of various kinds, not just VCRs, were made to a low mechanical standard and software kludges were used to mask over their imperfections, and vagaries. I have also seen this sort of thing in medical equipment too.
When the Ariane 501 rocket veered out of control, due to software anomalies and disintegrated, I though to myself, well, if the hardware was properly designed, it would never have obeyed the software to the extent it did and allowed a catastrophic failure.