falter
Veteran Member
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&id=201383846637&alt=web
Did anyone here score this beastie? Can't believe I missed it!
Did anyone here score this beastie? Can't believe I missed it!
I'm a big fan of the 264 series, having got a 232 and a V364, but the price here was silly. It's a nice piece of history but the only thing different between this machine and a +4 is the label and the missing 3+1 ROM's. The 232 and 364 were at least interesting from the point of having unique hardware, whereas the MB in this machine is a stock +4 MB.http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&id=201383846637&alt=web
Did anyone here score this beastie? Can't believe I missed it!
My memory says there were no 264s, only some prototype cases. Maybe my memory is wrong, I'll have to check.What do you mean, wasn't a real 264?
Interesting.
According to that link, it should have a Plus 4 mainboard.
According to that link, it should have a Plus 4 mainboard.
I've seen two "264"s in my life: my own and Jim Brains. If you are only looking at the motherboard, the only way that I've seen to tell that you are looking at an actual 264 and not a Plus/4 is to check the kernal ROM revision. As the 264 was the pre-release name of the Plus/4, they were often kept around Commodore for firmware development (which always comes last), and for shipment to software developers. As a result, one would expect (and, in fact, find) pre-release EPROMs.
- Bo
P.S. I guess another check would be for the Round power plug as opposed to the final release Square plug -- though I've heard of a few Plus/4's that left the factory with round plugs as well, so it's a necessary-but-not-sufficient condition.
So when will you open up the official Commodore Museum? Would finally be a reason for me to visit Texas... :3
Is there actually any Commodore Computer not in your collection already? Looking at your collection the 264 was prolly not even close to the most expensive buy...