Bob-O-Rama
Experienced Member
Given that it's a Far East origin (Taiwan?) board with lots of missing components and 2 electrolytics where tantalums might be a better choice, I strongly suspect MLC just from the point of saving quatloos by the vendor.
Just an aside on some of the missing components: the WD10C came in various incarnations. The WD10C23 reduced the number of needed support parts down to 3, from 11 to 15 required by the prior versions. Several of these versions were being simultaneously produced by WD, but the WD10C23 could replace all of them as it supported MFM and RLL, hard and soft sectoring, and a faster data rate.