• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here

Poll: eZ80 TRS-80ish design backwards compatibility.

Poll: eZ80 TRS-80ish design backwards compatibility.

  • 100% III/4 hardware level

    Votes: 5 62.5%
  • 100% Model 4/4P hardware level only

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Some Model 4/4P hardware, III through a shim

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Forget III/4, needs to be MAX-80 compatible!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Forget III/4, needs to be Model II compatible!

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • 100% III/4/II/12/MAX-80 software compatible, DOS level.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Only published TRSDOS/LS-DOS calls, let's don't cripple the eZ80!

    Votes: 2 25.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .

lowen

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Messages
1,684
Location
Western North Carolina, USA
So, what trips your trigger in terms of how much backwards compatibility a new eZ80-based TRS-80ish computer must have? I'm mostly concentrating on LS-DOS/TRSDOS compatibility here; CP/M and MP/M already have ports to eZ80 and porting to this design wouldn't be hard.

Do you want a machine that can run unmodified DOSes or just well-behaved programs that only use the TRSDOS/LS-DOS exposed API? I'm thinking about the keyboard, video, real physical floppy drives, real physical hard drives, etc. Please post your discussion items; what's most important?

For me; I'm happy with published calls only, no physical floppies or hard disks (floppy images and hard disk images on SD card are ok for me), something beyond what the hardware of the 4P can do now, but with enough hardware support for the LS-DOS system itself to be easily ported. I want high-res graphics, too, through a VGA or HDMI/DisplayPort connection. And I want something beyond emulation; if I wanted emulation, either sdltrs or trs80gp are sufficient to meet the LS-DOS need, and for CP/M there's no reason to go past the superb z80pack emulator.
 
Last edited:
So, what trips your trigger in terms of how much backwards compatibility a new eZ80-based TRS-80ish computer must have? I'm mostly concentrating on LS-DOS/TRSDOS compatibility here; CP/M and MP/M already have ports to eZ80 and porting to this design wouldn't be hard.

Do you want a machine that can run unmodified DOSes or just well-behaved programs that only use the TRSDOS/LS-DOS exposed API? I'm thinking about the keyboard, video, real physical floppy drives, real physical hard drives, etc. Please post your discussion items; what's most important?

For me; I'm happy with published calls only, no physical floppies or hard disks (floppy images and hard disk images on SD card are ok for me), something beyond what the hardware of the 4P can do now, but with enough hardware support for the LS-DOS system itself to be easily ported. I want high-res graphics, too, through a VGA or HDMI/DisplayPort connection. And I want something beyond emulation; if I wanted emulation, either sdltrs or trs80gp are sufficient to meet the LS-DOS need, and for CP/M there's no reason to go past the superb z80pack emulator.

It appears eZ80 would have an i/o conflict with trs80 software. eZ80 onboard i/o cannot be changed per zilog.

That is really said they made a chip to replace legacy CPUs and this thing has i/o conflicts.
 
Back
Top