Ole Juul
Veteran Member
I'm posting here specifically because it is listed under Genres and the Vintage Computer Software section is under Technical Support, which is not what I'm looking for. However, this is about DOS.
In recent years I've taken more of a liking to UNIX and gotten a bit of a grip. I notice that UNIX people often refer to "the UNIX way", when talking about command line usage and not using pre-made graphical solutions such as Windows (MS or otherwise). This seems in total keeping with "the DOS way", which is basically similar in that it eschews graphical overlays and prefers personal control. In fact I think that DOS fits under the UNIX heading just fine. The utilities seem to be copied from UNIX and the syntax seems to be a simplified user friendly version, watered down for public use. So, this post is just a note about that and why I feel that DOS discussions should happen here.
A secondary reason for this post should probably go elsewhere, but relates to the first. Many times I've gotten fooled when replying to posts in the Vintage Computer Software section (and elsewhere) when the subject has the word DOS in it. What happens is that, although the subject actually turns out to be Windows, the original poster has used the word DOS in the title. To my way of thinking, and personal experience, Windows is not "the DOS way". The DOS way is like the UNIX way.
In recent years I've taken more of a liking to UNIX and gotten a bit of a grip. I notice that UNIX people often refer to "the UNIX way", when talking about command line usage and not using pre-made graphical solutions such as Windows (MS or otherwise). This seems in total keeping with "the DOS way", which is basically similar in that it eschews graphical overlays and prefers personal control. In fact I think that DOS fits under the UNIX heading just fine. The utilities seem to be copied from UNIX and the syntax seems to be a simplified user friendly version, watered down for public use. So, this post is just a note about that and why I feel that DOS discussions should happen here.
A secondary reason for this post should probably go elsewhere, but relates to the first. Many times I've gotten fooled when replying to posts in the Vintage Computer Software section (and elsewhere) when the subject has the word DOS in it. What happens is that, although the subject actually turns out to be Windows, the original poster has used the word DOS in the title. To my way of thinking, and personal experience, Windows is not "the DOS way". The DOS way is like the UNIX way.