• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here
  • From now on we will require that a prefix is set for any items in the sales area. We have created regions and locations for this. We also require that you select a delivery option before posting your listing. This will hopefully help us streamline the things that get listed for sales here and help local people better advertise their items, especially for local only sales. New sales rules are also coming, so stay tuned.

Vintage DELL 316SX Desktop Sold for $3,000.00 ???

The Dell System 316SX was a landmark computer, but it was not the first to be branded Dell. We had shipped several systems under the name "Dell" by this time, although we had recently changed the name of the company from PCs Limited (in 1987) to Dell Computer, and had just moved our headquarters into the new office in "the Dell building" over on MoPac in Austin.

This was the right computer at the right time. Windows had just been released, but it would only run on '386 machines. The '386s that were on the market were all very expensive, and this situation was keeping Windows from taking off as Microsoft desired. Microsoft needed a cheaper platform to get Windows off the ground. They were encouraging the computer manufacturers at the time to produce a less expensive '386 computer for mass use. They had already worked with Intel to produce a '386 processor without a math co-processor, so it could be priced to be relatively inexpensive. Michael Dell authorized the project, code-named "Falcon," in 1988.

Our project team at Dell worked really hard to get this system finished in record time. At its release, the Dell System 316SX was the first 386-SX computer in production in the world. It had a 16 MHz clock, thus the name. As I said, '386 architecture allowed it to run Windows, unlike the '286 machines, and unlike the other '386 machines then on the market, the computer was priced to be very affordable. We were also able to introduce several cost-saving innovations at the same time that helped lower the sales price.

The thing sold like hotcakes. This was definitely the right machine at the right time.

When Intel a bit later came out with the 25 MHz version of the '386SX, so we revised the 316SX design in a project code-named "Peregrine," and called it the System 325. Project manager for both.
Welcome to the forum Paul. Interesting insight.
A couple of points- 1. No 386 ever had co-processors on the chip. It was an add-on chip fitted to the 387 sockets on the motherboards 2. Windows/286, 3.0 and 3.1 ran fine on a 286 class machine of the same speed. The later two just didn't run in enhanced mode. Windows didn't really take off until version 3.0 was released which was 1990. I guess this put the earlier 386sx machines in a good position though. The majority of folk still relied on Dos to carry out their computing tasks and ram wasn't cheap.
3. There is an area to introduce yourself on the forum.
 
Last edited:
Maybe out of topic but after so many years, I finally de-installed our last Dell 386/25 which was running Windows3.11 continuously 24/7 doing scada monitor apps.
I saved it from the recycle bin, cleaned it and upgraded the ps fans and added to my retro collection.

Dell PCs nowadays don't have that much longevity.
 
When Intel a bit later came out with the 25 MHz version of the '386SX, so we revised the 316SX design in a project code-named "Peregrine," and called it the System 325. Project manager for both.

I know necro-posting is bad (sorry!), but in the hopes that Paul Guinn will see this someday, I wanted to say that I have both of these systems and they are some of my favorites. The 316 in particular is my #1 "go-to" system for running anything designed for the 12-20MHz 286/386 era.
 
I don't have that feature enabled. By the way, what exact feature is that? And, unless it's enabled by default I doubt that a one-time-wonder has it enabled, either. Besides, he didn't respond to any of the earlier replies, not even those where he was directly quoted. So, again, it's sure seems highly unlikely here.
 
It's the default checkbox ticked when starting a new thread ("Subscribe to this thread and notify me of changes").

Another trick I've used (for this specific purpose I might add) is sending them a PM via the forum. That's a separate checkbox in the preferences, and may generate a notification where thread replies do not.
 
It's the default checkbox ticked when starting a new thread ("Subscribe to this thread and notify me of changes").
FWIW, it's not the default in my setup. I don't subscribe to my newly started threads and I never un-tick any checkboxes, either.
 
Back
Top