First, apropos of the original topic: This may be just a sync-on-green issue. I found
this thread on nextcomputers.org and one solution there was an inline DE-15 SOG module. It's possible this would be a less expensive solution than active, signal-modifying alternatives (e.g., OSSC), but after eight years I imagine the trail for this particular doohickey has gone cold. The more forgiving multisync monitors have the SOG circuitry built-in—I get a stable video on the Sony CRT from an Apollo Domain monochrome adapter with just the green BNC connector on a 5 BNC-to-VGA cable. Looks I'm on the hunt for an inline SOG module or its schematic now.
tokenalt sez:
I just bought a new monitor that can do it a few weeks ago. A ViewSonic VX2485.
It is reassuring that some of the monitors still being made with VGA inputs can handle the weirder resolutions and refresh rates. I don't see VGA going away entirely any time soon—while some vendors have tried to introduce HDMI or (mini-)DP for video, VGA is still seems to be the prevailing standard on rack mount servers. However, caveat emptor... not all VGA-capable displays are created equal. I've recently worked with HPE hardware using a something-to-VGA+USB+serial dongle (HP(E) P/N 676277-B21 aka Cisco P/N 37-1016-01 aka ???) and only one of the many display makes/models on our various crash carts could manage to display the video output. The HPE Apollo system in question does graphical overlays and uses various resolutions to unnecessarily beautify the POST and BIOS configuration screens, and given the singular success between the machine, the frankendongle, and the displays, corners are clearly being cut these days to save a few pennies at the cost of full compatibility.
Also, if you also want to go beyond the constraints of de facto 16:9 HDMI formatting and need unscaled DVI 1920 × 1200 resolution or composite/S-/component video inputs (*weakly raises hand*) you probably will have to go back to displays of the aughts (looking at you, Dell 2408WFP). I haven't seen a new 16:10 DVI display in forever.
For those who are okay with cheap, used, non-widescreen options, I recommend the Dell 1707FP as an all-purpose test monitor for Y2K-era or older hardware. Its 5:4 aspect ratio is due to its native 1280 × 1024 resolution (a Sun Microsystems favorite) but in addition to VGA it includes a DVI input that (IIRC) can be letterboxed or stretched. I know from personal experience that this can handle the NeXT color output with only a DB-13W3/DE-15 adapter, as well as sync-on-green BNC-based monochrome or color output.
Raritan color commentary (pun intention optional) follows for those few who want to keep reading...
Eudimorphodon sez:
For laughs I opened up a manual for the old Paragon series, and those
seem to have used an analog format for hauling video across the Cat5 wiring, but from digging around more it's fair to say that Raritan has always been more than a little cagy about *exactly* what the heck they're doing; with the newer models I genuinely have no idea if their "digital" CIMs convert video to analog, if their modern analog ones convert to digital, or if the head-end natively accepts both. (Ran across a postively head-spinning CIM compatibility matrix that definitely didn't help, other than make it clear that the Paragon I CIMs haven't been supported for... a while, but there was in fact a weird period where some of them *were* supported by some of the more modern headends until software version x.y.z...) So... yeah. My knowledge of the old ways almost definitely does not apply anymore.
"
Alderaan Paragon is peaceful! We have no weapons!"
I've seen that same compatibility matrix in the sacred texts(!) and it makes one go smooth-brained pretty quickly. Not only is Raritan cagy about their interface specs, they won't avail firmware for EOL'd devices after a certain point (I've asked) and there's no trace of copies in the usual Internet software archives. This is annoying in a general sense since there can be marked differences between revisions for any given particular product model (e.g., the MCC switches I have vary in terms of OSD fonts, computer name retention behavior, and tier (in)compatibility)—if you buy ancient Raritan hardware you're stuck with its particular firmware forever.
You can see the advent of the original Cat5/8P8C Paragon pinout emerging from their UKVM, URKVM, and AUATC* devices. One can pair a powered URKVM receiver with the first generation CIMs (before they were called CIMs): UKVMPD (dual PS/2), USKVMSD (Sun), and UUSBPD (USB). I'm guessing around this time the data center rack system market exploded and Raritan decided to drop the old DB-25 CCP(T) cable interface on MCCs in favor of the more densely-packed Paragon. (The 32-port Paragon UMT8 is 1U, while its 32-port predecessor MasterConsole MX432 is 4U.) However, while the adoption of Cat5 made cable management infinitely easier, nothing beats the signal quality of the original CCP(T) cables. (And I'm serious, the Raritan's cable gauge and/or shielding material is like none other—I've tried to use a variety of fully-wired DB-25 extension cables and aside from genuine Raritan CCP(T)xxEs, everything causes ghosting.)
One of these days—probably decades from now if/when I'm retired—I'd like to figure out what each of the DB-25 and 8P8C connector pins actually do. The DB-25 connector almost certainly is just a wire-for-wire aggregation of the VGA and PS/2 (or occasionally Sun) connectors; you'd think there might be some special sauce for switch tiering, but the switch-to-switch connections need only VGA+PS/2 connections on the tier 2 side and it appears to be controlled through elaborate keyboard escape sequences (based on glitches I've witnessed). (
Maybe there's some protocol going over the DDC wires? I have my doubts.) On the Cat5 side, three wires are clearly used for unmodified RGB signals (discovered that when one cable with a broken red wire resulted in cyan-o-vision); I'd wager keyboard/mouse signal conversion happens inside the dongle since the three different peripheral dongle types can all speak to the URKVM using the same Cat5 cable.
*I have a soft spot for the AUATC: it's a VT100 in a box with PS/2 (& Sun!) keyboard and VGA hookups... and again, it speaks Raritan U(R)KVM/Paragon Cat5 protocol if you're into that kind of thing. They pair pretty nicely with the consoles of Cyclades/Avocent serial console servers, but that's another thread.