• Please review our updated Terms and Rules here

I have become obsessed with vintage printers.

keenerb

Veteran Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
861
Location
Georgia, USA
I really have no idea how this happened, but here I am.

Since I've spent literally months tinkering with various vintage printers, modern printers, and printer emulators I suppose I might as well share some of what I've found regarding vintage printers, new printers, and connectivity options between printers and modern and vintage systems.

The vintage stuff first:

Old inkjets are EVERYWHERE and CHEAP. They also have been an ENORMOUS waste of time. Yes that's been the general consensus on various vintage forums for a long time, but I had to see how bad it really was for myself. Hard to find good ink, the ink heads clog quickly if they sit idle, waste tanks are often already completely full, printers that cycle over and over agagin after powering on, etc etc. the usual sad inkjet stories. HOWEVER, I did have great luck with several HP Deskjet 800 series with parallel AND usb ports, like the 832c. The 832c has actually been working very well, I scheduled a print job that prints a small cyan/magenta/black pattern and it runs once a week, this seems to keep the print heads clear of clogs.

As far as dot matrix printers go, I have yet to find a dot matrix that failed to work. Every sh*tty, beat up, cracked case dot matrix I picked up on Facebook market place or on ebay or from facebook friends has been completely operational. This technology must have been practically bulletproof, every Epson Actionprinter T1000, T3000, Tandy DMP105/133/130, Epson LQ800, handful of Okidatas, and another half-dozen have all powered on and will run self-test printouts and print from computers just fine. Old dried up ribbons haven't been much of a problem, the old WD40 trick works great and so does transplanting modern/brand new ribbons into old cartridges so far. Tractor feed paper is a little more expensive than it used to be but it's still out there and it's still tremendously satisfying to rip the little borders off of after you print a few pages out.

Laser printers were a very mixed bag, at least as far as vintage ones go. Paper feed problems plagued the two old laserjets (II and III) I tried, one eventually started complaining front panel was open when it clearly wasn't and switch tested just fine. I ordered a handful of toner cartridges that arrived with the toner as a rock-solid block inside the cartridge, one of which destroyed the internal mechanisms of a LJIII. Parts, drums, fusers, etc. seem hugely difficult to source. I tried two Laserjet 1100's (I believe from mid-2000's?) which worked fairly well overall, but were't exactly my idea of a "vintage" laser printer. They also still had infrequent paper feed errors and one died with a pretty impressive pop and smell of smoke. RIP that capacitor.

I also tried some modern hardware.

I was unable to find new parallel port-equipped modern laser printers, unsurprisingly.

Epson makes brand-new 9 and 24-pin printers of various sizes and features, with USB, serial, AND parallel interfaces. I picked up an LX-350 for 9-pin, and an LQ590II for 24-pin. They work absolutely perfectly with old applications using common 9-pin and 24-pin drivers like the LX800 and LQ-570 respectively. They are also very fast and have a lot of nice options I don't remember from my vintage printers like auto tear-off advance and switching to single-sheet feed without unloading tractor-feed paper, and pretty advanced paper handling options like front/rear/bottom paper inputs and straight-path feeding for labels.

Surprisingly, modern HP inkjets still support native PCL of at least some compatible level, because it's possible to use old deskjet drivers to print to them! Using a Deskjet 500c/550c/610c/832c driver with my SmartTank 6001 provided varying quality of printouts but they were all exactly as I'd expect from the respective vintage printer. This was all very much a surprise.

I also picked up a Retroprinter, which is a centronics interface daughterboard that attaches to a raspberry pi and functions as a virtual printer, rendering pages to PDF and can emulate many printers including Epson 9/24 pin, Deskjet, IBM, and a hefty number of other devices. It works very well, and can actually function as a dumb interface and pass raw LPT input directly to an attached usb printer which allows my DOS apps to print directly to my HP smart tank as if it were an old Deskjet 500/600 device. It worked well, although some oddities regarding page borders cause the printout on the retroprinter to be offcenter compared to the real printer output, but that wasn't of any real significance and probably a setting I haven't figured out yet.

As far as connectivity goes, I've been using an interesting phoneline printer sharing network to connect my three vintage machines to a DB25 switchbox, but it essentially replaces some DB25 cables and a switchbox so it's not particularly interesting. The old printers worked fine with the old computers and old software, which was no surprise, but the new Epson printers worked perfectly as well. I have ordered a parallel port to USB active adapter which promises to allow vintage computers to print to modern USB printers but it hasn't arrived yet, it'll be a little while to ship from Germany.

Amusingly enough, most of these vintage machines worked perfectly well with MODERN systems. I used a variety of interface methods, the two that worked the best were a USB to LPT cable (out of four I tried, three did not work!) and some old parallel port print servers off of Ebay that were basically dedicated LPD (line printer daemon) servers that Windows 11 supported just fine. Windows 11 still maintains drivers for HP printers back to before the 500, and Epson provides new, supported printer drivers for their current dot-matrix printers that work just fine with the old 9/24 pin printers. Printouts of modern documents on the 9-pin printers look pretty terrible, but I'm HUGELY impressed at the quality of the 24-pin printer output for black and white documents. Color starts to get pretty ugly but a monochrome document looked good enough that I'm essentially using an LQ590II as my daily printer even from Windows.

I also learned that an application called Printfil exists that allows DOSBOX-X to print to physical printers, and by leveraging some Netgear PS101 print servers I can now print to any of my vintage or new printers from within Dosbox on windows just like they are attached locally to an MSDOS desktop system. It's been working very well so far.

Hopefully that was interesting to at least one person other than myself.
 
I'm not about to start collecting printers because of the space and mechanical problems, but I do understand where you are coming from. There is something compelling about an electro-mechanical device that does something useful. Printers take electrons, bits and bytes and turn them into something tangible we can hold.

You might be interested in this: https://www.brutman.com/jpg2prn/jpg2prn.html It's code to format JPGs for ESC P compatible printers. I wrote it with a specific printer in mind but the "generic" setting should work on most printers that still have ESC P. Even my Brother Laser printer was fine with the generated output.
 
I got rid of most of the printers, gave away or donated to Goodwill, sold a few on Ebay. I'm currently down to six, the two new Epsons, two old Epson (T1000 and T3000), and two Tandy printers (DMP130a and 133). I need to track down one of the Brother printers with laserjet and Epson emulation built-in to completely my collection...

I like your utility. I will have to give it a shot!
 
There is something compelling about an electro-mechanical device that does something useful. Printers take electrons, bits and bytes and turn them into something tangible we can hold.
Oh no, that's the least of it. Couldn't give a cr*p about that.

What printers did do was expand your display space. Print out that big listing and spread it out across your desk, and you're no longer limited by that 40x24 display (or 80x24 if you were lucky): you can have pages and pages in front of you without scrolling. It's amost as if you have a 4K monitor that lets you have five or six 112-line xterms side by side. (That's about ten printer pages.)
 
I have a NEC Spinwriter (parallel interface) that's been sitting on a shelf for a few years. Don't know if it still works, but pay shipping (it's not light) and it's yours.
 
Our first family computer printer was a Deskjet 840c. It did its job well apart from wasting the color ink as it didn't have the separate color tanks.

I didn't know daisy wheel printers are desirable now... I picked up a Brother HR-25 on a whim some years ago (massive monstrosity) and fooled around with different daisy wheels.

Apparently the HR series came with a weird word processor keyboard add-on. https://thecomputerarchive.com/archivemain/Printers/Fully Formed/Brother HR-20.PDF
It would be cool to have if it works with the HR-25 as well. There isn't much info about it.

Otherwise I have a Triumph Adler dot matrix printer as of recently (https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?attachments/p2-drh80-1-jpg.1263925/) built like a tank, probably indestructible as you noticed is the case with dot matrix printers. And the accursed NeXT laser printer which refuses to be fixed.

At some point I too asked myself how I ended up with three obsolete printers in my possession...
 
Personally, I feel printers are underrated. I'd love to get a wide format dot matrix printer, the sort of thing that would print bulky financial reports on green bar paper.

For the longest time, printers were an essential part of a personal computer system. You would type up your report on your word processor, and then PRINT it to hand it in. Then desktop publishing took of and you could do much fancier things than little greeting cards.

Deskjet? Hell, I've got a Deskjet 694c sitting right here that I used to use a lot. Still got it hooked up just in case, but they stopped making ink carts for it some years back. Even when it was new, it seemed like every time I needed to use it, I had to replace the ink cartridges. Either they dried up, leaked out, or the nozzle jammed up. Mostly use a Laserjet 1300n now, but I haven't had good luck with toner.

Now, the Epson MX-80 series was almost everywhere, OEMed by many 8-bit vendors as well as IBM, and supported by almost all software. Used to have the TI-99/4A Impact printer a long time ago. Aquired a nice generic MX-80 off of eBay. At the time Microcenter still had two MX-80 compatible ribbons on the shelf. Bought both of those and never saw any more there again.
 
Long ago, at a surplus outlet, I recall seeing a very wide carriage daisywheel with mulple print heads. Apparently used by banks, etc. for printing multiple forms.
In the title business and in some legal areas, "3M" multiple-copy forms were mandated; you either used a typewriter or a daisywheel with them Dot-matrix didn't have quite the definition needed.
 
Personally, I feel printers are underrated. I'd love to get a wide format dot matrix printer, the sort of thing that would print bulky financial reports on green bar paper.

For the longest time, printers were an essential part of a personal computer system. You would type up your report on your word processor, and then PRINT it to hand it in. Then desktop publishing took of and you could do much fancier things than little greeting cards.

Deskjet? Hell, I've got a Deskjet 694c sitting right here that I used to use a lot. Still got it hooked up just in case, but they stopped making ink carts for it some years back. Even when it was new, it seemed like every time I needed to use it, I had to replace the ink cartridges. Either they dried up, leaked out, or the nozzle jammed up. Mostly use a Laserjet 1300n now, but I haven't had good luck with toner.

Now, the Epson MX-80 series was almost everywhere, OEMed by many 8-bit vendors as well as IBM, and supported by almost all software. Used to have the TI-99/4A Impact printer a long time ago. Aquired a nice generic MX-80 off of eBay. At the time Microcenter still had two MX-80 compatible ribbons on the shelf. Bought both of those and never saw any more there again.
That's partially becaue this is the compatibility list for the Epson MX-80 8750 cartridge. I'd wager it's the most commonly used ribbon ever made! Very easy to find good ones online and my most commonly used donor ribbon to transplant into other dry ribbon cartridges.

Code:
Compatible ADP CDK models:
210 N
Compatible Access Matrix Corp. models:
Access
Compatible Access Microcomputer models:
Epson FX80
Compatible Actrix Computer Corp. models:
Actrix
Compatible Adcomp models:
FX 80
Compatible Adler models:
DMP 25
Compatible Anker Data Systems models:
2000
Compatible Antex Data Systems models:
2000
Compatible Anzac Computer Equipment models:
1080, 1080P
Compatible Applied Micro Computer Systems models:
Documate
Compatible Autograph models:
182
Compatible Azurdata models:
80 COL. OS
Compatible Basic Four/MAI models:
4217
Compatible Berthold models:
Miniprinter S
Compatible Burroughs/Unisys models:
AP 1314
Compatible Cal Abco models:
80
Compatible Candela Electronics models:
Autotas
Compatible Casio models:
FP 1000, FP 1012 PR, FX 9000 P
Compatible Citizen models:
MSP : 10, 10 E, 20, 20 E, 40, 50
Prodot: 9
AL10, HSP 500
Compatible Columbia Data Products models:
1500, 1800
Compatible Com-Star models:
2000
Compatible Commodore models:
4022, 8022, CBM PET 4022, VIC 4512
Compatible Compuprint models:
4/12, 4/22, 922 N, 922 N Plus
Compatible Control Data (CDC) models:
Cyber 110
Compatible Data General models:
6156, Dasher G 30
Compatible Datamod models:
8020
Compatible Dictaphone models:
Mastermind
Compatible Diebold models:
System 1000
Compatible Digital Equipment/DEC models:
LA 70
Compatible Easiprint models:
160
Compatible Epson models:
ActionPrinter: 2000, Apex 80, T-1000, 2000 ActionPrinter, T-1000
FX: 70, 70 Plus, 80, 80 Plus, 80II, 85, 86E, 800, 850, 870, 880, 880 Plus
LX: 300, 300 +, 400, 800, 810, 850, -300+ II
3210, 3310, Apex 80, Apex 1000, Apex T-1000, CTM F-80, ERC-04, JX-80, M 3210, M 3310, MX 70, MX 80, MX 80 F/T, MX 80 F/T II, MX 80 F/T III, MX 80 II, MX 80 III, MX 82, MX 82 F/T III, MX 85, MX 90, P80RA - RX80, RX 70, RX 80, RX 80 F/T, RX 80 F/T Plus, X 10
Compatible Evolution Corp. models:
MX 80
Compatible Excelan models:
Printer
Compatible Exidy Systems models:
DP 6105
Compatible Fortis models:
DM 2010, DM 2010T, DM 2210
Compatible Four Phase models:
PC 4225, PC 4235
Compatible Fujitsu models:
Micro 165
Compatible HP models:
82905 A, 82905 B, 82906 A, 92156 A
Compatible Heathkit models:
MX80
Compatible Hengstler models:
890
Compatible Hennes Ltd. models:
FX86E
Compatible Hitachi models:
HP 125
Compatible Honeywell models:
4/12, 4/20, 4/22, 922 N, 922 N Plus, Italia 4/20, Italia 4/22, Model 20, PRT 4142, PRT 4201, PRT 4202, PRT 4204, PRT 4222, PRT 9222, PRU 4201, PRU 4202, PRU 4203, PRU 4204, PRU 7180, PRU 7181, PRU 7182
Compatible IBM/InfoPrint models:
5152 Graphics, 5153 Graphics, Graphics Printer, Personal Computer Graphics
Compatible ITT Courier models:
3030, 3809, System 3030
Compatible Juki models:
5510, 5520
Compatible Lampar models:
Osborne MOD 1
Compatible Lanier models:
DM-80, MX 80
Compatible Lee Data models:
1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 3270
Compatible Mirwald Electronic models:
BX80
Compatible Mitsuba models:
PFX-85
Compatible Mohawk models:
2147, 2148
Compatible Monolithic Systems models:
MSC 8406
Compatible NCR models:
7450 W/7150
Compatible Nakajima models:
AR 50, AR 60B, DP 6800, NP-2200
Compatible Norsk Data models:
ND 424, ND 470
Compatible Olympia models:
Compact NP, Compact RO-NP, Electronic Compact NP, NP 80, NP 80APL, NP 80S, NP 80SE
Compatible Ontel models:
Amigo
Compatible Osborne models:
Model 1
Compatible Packintell models:
SX 850
Compatible Philips models:
2000, 2123, NMS 1437, NMS 1438, NMS 1439, P2123, P2906, P2908, P2918, PT88
Compatible Pragmatic Systems models:
Inspector
Compatible Prime models:
Inspector
Compatible Printec models:
9130
Compatible Samsung models:
SP-0930 N
Compatible Sanyo models:
Serd FX80
Compatible Sharp models:
CE 33 P, CE 322 P, CE 332 P, Inspector, MZ 80 P5, MZ 80 P6, PC 3201
Compatible Siemens models:
9001, Needle Printer, PT 88
Compatible Standard Register models:
T 4100, T 4200, T 4325, T 4330
Compatible Summa models:
Four Innkeeper
Compatible Sweda models:
6500
Compatible Swintec models:
SP 809 D
Compatible TEC models:
GP-8908, GP-8908 S
Compatible Tandberg models:
TDD8801, TDD8811
Compatible Tandem models:
5545
Compatible Teletex models:
165D, TTX 165D
Compatible Texas Instruments models:
99-4, 99-4A
Compatible Tredia models:
DX 120
Compatible Triumph Adler models:
DMP 25
Compatible Unisys models:
DU810, DU870
Compatible Univac models:
0449, Model 5
Compatible Victor models:
6010, 9000 N.S.
Compatible Wang models:
75PC-PM09T, 2245, PC-PM010
Compatible Wilcox models:
2000
Compatible Wilson-Jones models:
Business Computer SYS
Compatible Wincor Nixdorf models:
2504-1, 2504-4, 2504-7, Mini Compact, ND 26
Compatible Zenith models:
MX80, Z89-MX80, Z90-MX80, Zdfx 80
Works in T1000, APEX 80, APEX 1000, FX80
Also for use in JX80, LX810, RX80 and more
Yield is approximate
Compatible with Epson AP2000
 
FX350 would be my suggestion for anyone wanting to experience "retro" 9-pin printing with both modern and vintage hardware, in the most convenient way possible. The serial/USB/LPT inputs on it give a lot of options and let you even print from Windows 11, Dosbox-x, and pretty much any vintage hardware you've got laying around just fine. It might not be an actual vintage printer but it's got a parallel port, takes pin feed paper, and accepts standard Epson ESC/P input from apps like Printshop 1.0 for DOS and MS Works and graphics.com.
 
Last edited:
For the longest time, printers were an essential part of a personal computer system. You would type up your report on your word processor, and then PRINT it to hand it in. Then desktop publishing took of and you could do much fancier things than little greeting cards.
I still print all the time. Electronic docs do have some advantages like instant searching and copy/paste, but I prefer to read hard copies.

I'll stop printing when I'm dead. Maybe even haunt the printer...
 
Yes, Daisy Wheel is vintage. I wish I still had my Smith Corona daisy wheel printer that I used with Wordstar on my Advantage. But I recall some early Apple printers that were thermal. And I also put some old Dot-Matrix and Lasers in the vintage category. I remember Tandy selling dot matrix printers that would work on their CoCo line and could also work on my NorthStar's or a C64 with some special cable creation. Lasers were very expensive back then and most of use couldn't afford them.

I hooked up my old Okidata dot matrix to my NEC 286 a few months back and was having fun printing on the old fan fold pin feed paper. Then I was setting up Windows 286 and apparently chose the wrong printer driver and ended up killing the printer. I think the pin print head got locked up. Anyway, all it does is blink at me now. I still have other old dot matrix printers but I'm sad I killed the old Okidata.

Seaken
 
The only way I could manage to get rid of an Olivetti daisywheel was to throw it in with an AT&T PC 6300 giveaway--and that was only possible because I threw that in with the Amstrad Joyce (US-configured) that the guy was willing to drive up and get.
 
The few vintage printers that I have probably would be of interest to very few collectors. I would, however, find some way to make room for a Xerox daisy wheel printer/terminal using the HyType II mech, though. They were genuine marvels of their time and built like tanks. I repaired them for several years in the field. Some of the chips might be a little tough to find now but it was an almost totally easily repairable/maintainable design.

The Qume "drop-in" (sort of), cost-reduced replacements for the HyType II were probably more expensive to maintain in the long run for my employer.
 
I used a Hitype I with the 12-bit OEM interface on my S100 system. Had driver software to do prop spacing, bidirectional printing and "smart" positioning. About a decade ago, acquired a 630. I found someone who was willing to pay shipping on it after many months of posting.
 
I guess I have a few small updates.

I found a NIB Brother HL printer with hardware PCL and FX-850 support and that's definitely staying in my collection. Both emulations seems to be spot-on with the apps I tested, although the text fonts in Epson mode are much more Laserjet-crisp than would be authentic. Both graphics and text modes are usable, although the top margin seems to be about a quarter-inch too low in epson emulation mode.

I also got my LPT 2 USB adapter from germany, and it has been a mixed bag. It has worked fine with my Epson dot matrix printers but they already had a parallel port. It works well with the Brother dot matrix printer. It didn't work at all with my Smart Tank HP printer which I found surprising since it prints fine with raw PCL output over LPR or just direct access in Linux.
 
I still have my 40 year old 9 pin C.Itoh M-1550 (mine is Phillips labeled) which is a wide format with tractor feed version of the more common C.Itoh 8510. My M-1550 has both a serial and parallel port and new ribbons are still available for this printer. I got it new from a surplus seller around 1984, I think. It had a custom ROM in it, but a friend that also bought one at the same time burnt new ROM's for the 1550's copying the ROM from his 8510.

My USB only HP 1014 laser printer has been in service for nearly 20 years. Not vintage in many ways, but being treated as vintage by HP/MS with their ending driver support in Windows 10/11. Workaround sort of works most of the time, but I need to manually reset the printer. I PITA now, not so when Windows XP was in still use, since I added a USB to ethernet adapter so I could share the printer. Now days having to physically manual reset the printer each time defeats the usefullness of having it hung on my network and so it get a lot less use and I'm loading up my Brother color laser with B&W stuff that I would rather print on my HP.

I seem to run into driver issues with printers. For many years (starting with Win 95??) the MS serial driver for the C.Itoh 8510/1550 printed one extra dot on the first page of anything printed - it took someone else rewritting the driver to fix it. AFAIK, MS never did update their serial driver. The parallel driver version worked just fine, but if you only had a free serial port and a daisywheel hung on the parallel port then that was no solution. I wonder if I still have a copy of the repaired serial driver floating around somewhere? If I find it I should archive it. These days my dot matrix noise maker only gets used with a CP/M 2.2 Ampro Little Board Z80 system or with my Epson QX16 CP/M/DOS computer.
 
Back
Top