daver2
10k Member
It should be possible to make a NOP generator for the 6504 CPU. I am sure we did something similar for a CPU in a Commodore disk drive at one point...
Dave
Dave
There are some interesting quirks involving using a 2732 to replace a 2332. One of them is that the 2332 came with mask programmable chip selects, at least Rockwell ones did, a company would specify how they wanted it when they ordered the chip. So that if you come across a 2332 in some machine, these may be different to one in another machine. Also Rockwell made two versions of the 2332 to complicate things as well. In any case , looking at the schematic that the particular 2332 is in, it is usually easy to see how the chip select system was organized and then the adapter can be made to suit that. I have attached a page from an article I did on the RM65 video card, when I was confronted with the same problem. Also it is actually easier to use a 2532 to replace a 2332 than a 2732.
Shouldn't you be using CS2 (the active HIGH chip select) from the 2332 socket and wiring that to the input of the inverter?
It becomes inverted (to become an active LOW signal) and you feed that into the active LOW /CE pin of the 2732 EPROM.
Yes, but look at the schematic for the printer to see how the original 2332 ROM is wired.
It is no good copying someone else's work if this ROM is wired differently!
I much prefer to use the 2532 than 2732's with adapters, because the 2532 suits the PET. Also other projects where there were once 2332's.Yes, in example the 2732->2332 character generator adapters for C=64 and VIC-20 are different from the 2732->2332 PET adapter (iirc the adapter for the VIC-20 is also different from the C=64 one).
So now I'm quite confused, because I don't know how to make a 2732->2332 adapter for the printer LOL
About the 2532 vs. 2732... you're right, but the 2532 is hard to find and quite expensive, and my programmer doesn't program them without an adapter... and I have a lot of 2732 too, so in my case it's easier to use a 2732.